Ferries
in Transition
Private
Runs, New Boats on Horizon
Washington
Business Magazine – February 2006
by
Paul Schlienz and Shawn Sullivan
Washington's
ferry system, the largest in the United States, is a crucial link in the
state’s transportation system. Without ferries, the San Juan Islands would
languish in isolation, the easy passage over the Puget Sound between Seattle
and the Kitsap Peninsula would be impossible, and there would be no surface
link between Washington and Vancouver Island. In short, western Washington
would be a completely different place.
Washington
State Ferries came into existence with the state's buyout of Puget Sound
Navigation in 1951. Originating in the early 1900s, Puget Sound ferry service
was initially provided by a number of companies using small steamers known as
the "Mosquito Fleet."
By
1929, the ferry industry had consolidated into two companies: Puget Sound
Navigation Co. and Kitsap County Transportation Co. A strike in 1935 forced
Kitsap County Transportation Co. out of business and left the Puget Sound
Navigation Co., commonly known as the Black Ball Line, with primary control of
ferry service on Puget Sound.
As
Washington's ferries enter their second century, it is a system in transition.
Will the system’s 54 year-old governmental monopoly hold, or will private ferry
operators be allowed to provide transportation options on the Puget Sound? And
how soon will the system’s aging vessels be replaced with new ferries?
A
war has been raging for three years between WSF, Kitsap Transit, Argosy Cruises
and Clipper Navigation. Each has its own agenda, plan and ideas for how the
ferry system should operate.
The
turmoil stems from one ferry run between Vashon Island, Southworth and West
Seattle — the run with the most daily riders. Washington State Ferries believes
one boat traveling from Seattle to Vashon, then to Southworth and back to
Seattle would service riders the best. "A ferry from Seattle to Southworth
is a no," Mike Anderson, WSF director said. "It would take too much
away from our ridership."
Kitsap
Transit Argosy Cruises and Clipper Navigation all disagree with WSF’s aversion
to a Seattle-Southworth run.
"The
people in Southworth are fodder to support the smaller number of riders in
Vashon," Richard Hayes, director of Kitsap Transit, said.
Kitsap
Transit wants to see the state implement a public-private partnership between
county transit authorities and private ferry operators. By having two smaller
boats running from Seattle to Vashon and from Seattle to Southworth, Kitsap
Transit has the blessing of both the riders in Southworth, and, more
importantly, the blessing of Seattle’s city council.
"Seattle
doesn’t want any additional car ferries," Hayes said. "We have
aligned ourselves with Seattle and private interests to live within the Growth
Management Act."
Why
the huge fight between WSF and Kitsap Transit?
"The
state's unions feel like they are in trouble because private ferry runs might
be successful," Hayes said. "Unfortunately, the unions have enough
power in the House to keep us from getting what we want."
Both
private ferry operators agree with Kitsap Transit's belief that unions are
significant part of the problem.
"No
one begrudges fair pay for fair work, but this is out of hand," Argosy
Cruises owner John Blackman said. "When it comes to operating
passenger-only ferry services, the private sector can do it more efficiently —
which ultimately keeps fares lower and riders happy."
Clipper
Navigation is concerned by WSF's inability to recognize high demand areas.
"Washington operates the largest ferry system, but the most populated
areas separated by water do not have a ferry service," Clipper Navigation
President Darrell Bryan said.
The
battle over passenger ferry service should conclude in the Legislature this
year, but which organization will get its way remains a mystery. Key players in
both the Senate and the House will have the final say. Let's just hope
legislators keep the best interest of taxpayers in mind when they finally
decide.
Building
ferries for the Washington fleet has been controversial as well. For example,
the most recent debate centers around replacing the Steel Electric boats, built
in 1927 and carrying 75 cars and 800 passengers. The boats, built the same year
Charles Lindbergh made the first trans-Atlantic flight, are relegated to less
traveled routes such as the Port Townsend-Keystone run connecting the Kitsap
Peninsula with Whidbey Island. Along with being antiquated, the Steel Electrics
have single compartment hulls which make them particularly susceptible to
sinking.
J.M.
Martinac, a Tacoma shipbuilder, proposed replacing the aging Steel Electric
boats. Martinac's first proposal called for five state-of-the-art, 130-vehicle,
1,200-passenger Island-class ferries which it would build and lease to the
state.
That
proposal was rejected by the ferry system and the Legislature. Martinac, a
union yard, then proposed to provide the designs to the state and competitively
bid on the boats. That proposal never reached critical mass even though the
long-time Tacoma shipbuilder believes it can show that their proposal saves
taxpayers and ferry riders money and provides safer boats to the fleet sooner.
Martinac
also contends its new ferries could safely navigate in and out of the Keystone
Harbor even at low tide and believes it can save the state from spending $53
millions to relocate the Whidbey Island dock and $38 million in maintenance
needed for the Steel Electrics.
WSF
engineers have their own plans. Last year WSF announced it would acquire four
new ferries.
"The
new ferries will fit in the mid-range of the ferry fleet," said Dave
Humphreys, WSF’s vessel project engineer for new construction. "They will
have capacity for 1,200 passengers and 130 to 144 autos, depending on the
Legislature’s budget, and will be interchangeable on different routes. Although
you won’t see them on the Seattle routes, they will be operating in the San
Juan Islands and on routes like Mukilteo to Clinton."
The
new vessels are planned to be the cleanest, most comfortable, safest and most
environmentally-friendly ferries that have ever sailed Washington’s waters.
Even
if the two watertight compartments are flooded, the vessels will remain stable.
Driving or walking on to a ferry will become safer and more accessible thanks
to lower slope ramps. In addition, wider lanes and higher clearances will
improve vehicle loading and accommodate large trucks.
"Our
new ferries will be designed to be very fast in loading and unloading
vehicles," Laurens Zuidweg, WSF’s director of vessel engineering, said.
The
ferries will have better heating and ventilation, and more internal seating.
The two passenger decks have sheltered observation areas, which will protect
passengers from the weather as they observe the great scenery that is visible
from every ferry route.
Initially,
it was expected that new construction to build the new ferries, estimated to
cost approximately $284 million, would begin in 2006, and that the first new
ferries would go into service in 2008. This timetable, however, has been
delayed, because the ferry system has gone back to the Legislature and
requested funding for five new ferries instead of the four that were originally
proposed. Currently, the Legislature is considering this request.
If
the Legislature agrees to the ferry system’s proposal, the contract for
constructing the new ferries will be awarded in July 2007. Delivery of the
first of the new ferries will then be slated for December 2009, with the
remaining four vessels following one at a time in eight-month intervals.
With
the critical importance of ferries to Washington’s transportation system, one
can only hope that the Legislature will act quickly so our aging ferry fleet
can be replaced with new, seaworthy vessels as soon as possible.
Washington's
ferries have served this state well through the years. It is essential that the
system remains absolutely first rate.